Who We Are

Sponsors

  • !

Contact Us

Find Us Here

Digg Facebook LinkedIn Reddit StumbleUpon
Blog powered by TypePad

More Info

« Music of Mariachi | Main | Better than Christmas: It's Wedding Season! »

July 19, 2007

Registry Schmegistry: To have or to have not

The Q: "I am having an engagement party (champagne toast and hors d'ouevres). I did not register because I thought it would be in poor taste but I have a few people who are giving me grief and acting as if I did not use proper etiquette. I was having the party as a celebration. We are not having a wedding but the purpose was not to get gifts out of people. Please advise." - Tammy

The A: Boy, people are really funny, aren't they? You ask for gifts and you're greedy, you don't ask for gifts and your inconsiderate! You just can't win! The truth is (and this is the truth according to the GENIUS Peggy Post) NO ONE is obligated to purchase you an engagement gift- and it's considered in POOR TASTE to imply that your guests should. So in actuality, your not registering is certainly no faux pax. However, because etiquette is only as good as the number of people who use it (and it seems that number is growing less and less) these kinds of things are likely to happen. To avoid turning the inquiries cantankerous, I suggest simply telling them that you would prefer people make a charitable donation. Charity has an amazing way of shutting people up!

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/2120592/20160980

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Registry Schmegistry: To have or to have not:

Comments

That is a fantastic advice, and so true, thanks!

Great question. I'd like to link to it from my own blog.

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In